Interview Bias: A How-To Guide on Minimizing It

How to Eliminate Interview Bias

Interview Bias: A How-To Guide on Minimizing It

“Woe to the man who tries to remain objective and to maintain a wide perspective: everyone will label him as an enemy.”

- Paul Tournier, Swiss physician

When it comes to reference checking or even the recruitment process in general, we often talk about what the candidate needs to bring to the table. We so often forget that the interview process is a two-way street and the role the interviewer plays is just as significant to consider. In this case, what does the recruiter bring to the table? Are they objective or inherently biased? If it’s that latter, what’s the solution? These are some of the questions we will attempt to tackle in today’s article.

Understanding the Issue of Interview Bias

When it comes down to the interview process, as a stranger, candidates get the raw end of the deal. This issue mainly boils down to how they are assessed by another stranger. When the candidate is someone the hiring manager is somewhat familiar with, then those people are assessed based on their past performances for the most part.

However, strangers are more or less judged on their motivation to get the job, some general competency standards, technical knowledge and their first impression. Now, don’t get us wrong, these are good measures to have when assessing a candidate, but not when it’s done through a biased lens. Let’s take a stranger who makes a good first impression, on some level the hiring manager will look for facts to justify their strengths. If it was a bad impression, they might subconsciously look for reasons to exclude them from the job.

The caveat here is, both sides can be factually backed up if you look hard enough. So, as you can see, interviewer bias has many layers to it, and it’s never really a clear-cut thing. Having said that, there are some ways in which one can reduce interview bias and keep the process relatively fair.

First impressions play a big role in interview bias
The first impressions play a huge role in the interview process. Try to hold off final decisions based on that alone.

Top 10 Ways to Reduce Interview Bias

Before we dive into the list of ways in which you can reduce interviewer bias, we need to make note of one simple fact. Bias can only ever be reduced or managed. As a rule of thumb, human beings are biased on some level, consciously or subconsciously. It’s in our nature, be it for the better or worse. Having said that, these tactics will help you manage the bias.

Tip #1: Define the Job Requirements, Not the Person

When you put out an ad for a job, you will of course provide a job description. This is usually where the bias can start. More specifically, you need to define the description as a set of things that need to be done by a person. Oftentimes you might find that it is a list of things that the person needs to have.

If during an interview the candidate proves that they have previously done such work, it means that they have the skills to get the job done. However, this can contradict what was listed in the job description. Once you redefine the work for performance objectives rather than candidate requirements, you open up the talent pool. This not only brings in diversity, but also reduces bias as you would be comparing their past experiences, and not their first impressions.

Tip #2: Do an Initial Phone Interview

One sure-fire way to reduce bias is to make the process a little less personal, at least initially. Before you even have an interview with the person, consider a normal phone call. This reduces bias by removing visual cues that could influence us. Instead, we would be going purely off their resume, track record and so on. Establishing a decent connection based purely on their performance history will set the pace for the rest of the interview. This way, the first onsite impression, be it good or bad, won’t matter, because you already know what they are capable of.

"You have to attempt to be objective about yourself"

- Charles Dance, Actor

Tip #3: Panel Interviews Can Help

Having a panel of interviewers, as opposed to one person, lessens the odds of there being any bias in the room. This is especially helpful if all the interviewers are assigned specific roles. Having this diversity and a controlled proceeding will give the interview a good balance.

Tip #4: Scripting Can Reduce Interview Bias

Scripting the interview, be it fully or partially can help reduce the interview bias as well. Giving the candidate the pre-scripted questions ahead of time brings down the chances of any deviations during the interview. This tip is pretty connected to the previous one, so perhaps consider combining them both in certain instances.

Tip #5: Take Time to Decide

Now, we don’t mean you need to be slow in deciding, but rather take your time and think it through. A good rule of thumb is to wait 30 minutes before you make any yes or no decisions. In the meantime, make sure to ask all the candidates the same set of questions, regardless of if you have a positive or negative reaction.

Tip #6: Taken Everything into Account

Much like how a courtroom operates, you need to take into consideration all the evidence, i.e., the facts, before settling on any one decision. To make the closest thing to a balanced decision, you need to have all the information in your hand. Once you have all this you can make a more informed and balanced decision that is fair to everyone involved.

The interviewer's mindset is perhaps one of the biggest influencers of the interview outcome, regardless of the candidate.

Eliminating interview bias also depends on the interviewer's state of mind

Tip #7: Reverse Psychology Is a Great Tool for Reducing Interview Bias

Remember the point we mentioned earlier about looking for facts that back up how we perceive a candidate? Well, this is a good way to combat that issue. Once you, the interviewer, have been through the recruitment process a few times, you will notice the pattern. Use this information to do work in opposition to what you perceive. Let’s use the earlier example of how we look for facts that back up how we perceive the candidates’ first impression.

Now, in such a case, force yourself to look for reasons that contradict how you perceive them. If they give a negative first impression, look for positive facts and vice versa. Think about it as looking for the other half of the puzzle.

Tip #8: Treat Candidates Like They Are Experts

When we interview people who are viewed as experts in their field, we tend to give them the benefit of the doubt. It is highly recommended that you treat every candidate as an expert too. If you give all your candidates the same courtesy, the truth will become obvious, whether you like them or not. This is a good way to objectively approach the recruitment process.

Tip #9: Use a Scoring System

When it comes down to personal opinions there will always be bias involved to some degree. This is good in certain instances where you have to use your intuition to judge the quality of the candidate. However, if you’re trying to reduce interview bias in the process, consider using a scoring system to back up your opinions. Perhaps something along the lines of a scorecard. 

Tip #10: First Impressions Should Be Considered Last

When all is said and done about the bias of first impressions, there is still a use for first impressions. They can reveal a lot about the character of the candidate, which is essential for assessing workplace compatibility. Having said that, reserve all judgements on first impressions and only consider them towards the end of the interview process. This will allow you to get a reasonably objective view of them as you won’t be that deterred or wooed by said impression. You will have facts and reasons to measure it against.

While all these steps are great individual tools, it would be better if some aspect of these guidelines were involved throughout the recruitment process. It drives up the overall quality of your recruitment process while driving down the chances of interview bias.

Hiring Metrics You Should be Tracking in 2022

Hiring Metrics help you improve your hiring strategy

Hiring Metrics You Should be Tracking in 2022

“It is much more difficult to measure nonperformance than performance.”

- Harold S. Geneen, Ex-President of ITT Corporation

Attracting high-quality candidates seems to be one of the biggest challenges that hiring managers face these days. To help drive the odds in their favour, one would measure and track certain hiring metrics. These metrics serve the purpose of acting as indicators. They show you where you stand in terms of success. They also show how much you have to grow and the changes you need to make to get there. Keep in mind that there are plenty of hiring metrics to track when attempting to capture the cream of the crop. However, some metrics are more important than others.

Determining which ones are more important depends to how your business defines success. Having said that, for growing businesses, it can be tough to know which metrics to prioritize. Hence, we have put together a list of hiring metrics for you that you need in 2022. Regardless of the direction your business might go in, these indicators can be applied to a variety of scenarios!

Hiring Metrics #1: Hires per Month

Hires per month and headcount growth is some of the most universal metrics when it comes to recruitment. Tracking your hires per month is essential. It tells you how many people your company hires on an average monthly basis. On the other hand, the headcount growth is a figure that you can aim for over a period of time- sort of like a recruitment goal.

By having these two metrics measured and tracked side-by-side you can have hard facts that tell you how well you are performing. You could have just one of those metrics, but having both works together is ideal. This is especially good for a business that plans to consistently hire and expand. However, you need to make sure that the growth targets are realistic. Take into account the size and capacity of the hiring team, the market trends, the nature of the role and so on.

Time to hire is one of the most important hiring metrics
The time it takes to interview can be an indicator to different things like candidate quality, time to hire, etc.

Hiring Metrics #2: Cost per Hire

While you track how often you hire people and how many you hire, it’s also important to measure the cost to the business. Remember, labour is not free and quality talent will make a dent in your budget. Now the cost to hire goes beyond just your employee’s salary. You have to take into consideration things like how much you’re paying a hiring agency (if applicable), the cost to be listed on a job board, membership fees for certain networks and so on. In some cases, you might even have to take into consideration the recruit’s relocation costs. All this will tell you how efficient your overall recruitment process is.

Hiring Metrics #3: Average Time per Interview

This metric is often mixed up with time to hire. The truth of the matter is, in the modern hiring landscape, the time to hire is too broad a concept. For example, the time to hire someone as a waiter will not be the same as the time it takes to hire an IT professional. These are two vastly different occupations with different hiring criteria and need to be handled as such. Therefore, having an average measure of time to hire, from the date of advertising the position to filling it, is unrealistic!

A better way to go about it is to measure the average time to interview candidates. This in itself will give you a measure of the time a candidate spends interviewing with your company. It will also give you additional data such as the candidate’s interviewing experience as well as your overall time to hire an individual. It’s a more compartmentalized approach, yet it works quite well for all intents and purposes.

Hiring Metrics #4: Probation Pass Percentage

Hiring a candidate that doesn’t stick around is a drain on your company’s time and resources. It is therefore all the more surprising how few companies consider post-hiring performance as an effective hiring metric. This is where the probation period comes in handy. By measuring the percentage of candidates that pass the probation, you can efficiently identify whether you’re hiring the right candidate. It will also give you a better idea of what kind of candidate might best fit the company culture and the quality standards you expect.

Yes, the probation pass numbers are a reflection of the recruitment efforts of your team or the recruitment agency that you employ. However, it is also a measure of the candidate’s willingness and aptitude. If there is a high percentage of candidates that fail the probation period, it could be that you are not hiring the right people or their skills aren’t measuring up to your expectations. In which case, you need to set clearer expectations and communicate the same when hiring. This metric is a good indicator of how to best alter the recruitment strategy.

Hiring Metrics #5: Measure Percentage of Inbound Hires

This is an important one. As a business with a working recruitment strategy, you need to know the percentage of your inbound hires. That is to say, how many people are approaching you, through the ads or job postings that you have put out. When you track this, you will get an idea of whether your recruitment efforts are reaching the right candidates and job market. If the inbound hires are not up to your expectations, then that means that you’re spending more time reaching out to candidates than they approach you.

Having a huge ratio of outbound hires to inbound hires could mean that the majority of your strategy isn’t reaching the right audience. It could also mean that it is reaching them, but not converting into anything of significance. This hiring metric will tell you how to adjust your advertising strategy and drive your efforts from that point.

There are tons of different metrics to measure your success, but only a few will work for you. Focus only on those!
Hiring Metrics

Hiring Metrics #6: Offer Acceptance Rate

This is one of the more obvious hiring metrics, but a necessary one nonetheless. Of course, you need to track the offer acceptance rate to identify how often you achieve the goal of securing talent. However, you should consider this metric as a primary indicator for other feedback points. If the offer acceptance rate is low, then the hiring experience might be poor, or you could be taking too long to process the candidate. Having said that, you shouldn’t aim for an unrealistic, ‘perfect’ acceptance rate score either. Doing that could take away from the attention you give to the quality of the candidate experience or the candidate themselves. Neither extreme is good for business. Maintaining a 75% to 85% acceptance rate is ideal in most cases.